<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: KFormat and DeviceKit-disks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.uninstall.it/2009/05/13/kformat-and-devicekit-disks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.uninstall.it/2009/05/13/kformat-and-devicekit-disks/</link>
	<description>Davide Bettio's weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:51:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Uninstall</title>
		<link>http://blog.uninstall.it/2009/05/13/kformat-and-devicekit-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-4298</link>
		<dc:creator>Uninstall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 11:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uninstall.it/?p=220#comment-4298</guid>
		<description>&gt;Please don’t have “kformat” in the title. imho it shouldn’t behave like
 &gt;an application, but just as part of the OS.
&gt;kformat shouldn’t be user visible anywhere. It should just always be
&gt;referred to as Format Disk.

right, I will change the title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>Please don’t have “kformat” in the title. imho it shouldn’t behave like<br />
 >an application, but just as part of the OS.<br />
>kformat shouldn’t be user visible anywhere. It should just always be<br />
>referred to as Format Disk.</p>
<p>right, I will change the title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Tapsell</title>
		<link>http://blog.uninstall.it/2009/05/13/kformat-and-devicekit-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-4294</link>
		<dc:creator>John Tapsell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 02:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uninstall.it/?p=220#comment-4294</guid>
		<description>Please don&#039;t have &quot;kformat&quot; in the title.  imho it shouldn&#039;t behave like an application, but just as part of the OS.
kformat  shouldn&#039;t be user visible anywhere.  It should just always be referred to as Format Disk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please don&#8217;t have &#8220;kformat&#8221; in the title.  imho it shouldn&#8217;t behave like an application, but just as part of the OS.<br />
kformat  shouldn&#8217;t be user visible anywhere.  It should just always be referred to as Format Disk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uninstall</title>
		<link>http://blog.uninstall.it/2009/05/13/kformat-and-devicekit-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-4279</link>
		<dc:creator>Uninstall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uninstall.it/?p=220#comment-4279</guid>
		<description>&gt;As all this is about Device-Kit, are there any plans for a Device-Kit Solid backend?
 &gt;AFAIK Fedora is going to switch to it in near future, so a backend for solid is
 &gt;necessary (or are HAL and Dev-Kit compatible so that no changes are required?)

Probably I will write a new solid backend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>As all this is about Device-Kit, are there any plans for a Device-Kit Solid backend?<br />
 >AFAIK Fedora is going to switch to it in near future, so a backend for solid is<br />
 >necessary (or are HAL and Dev-Kit compatible so that no changes are required?)</p>
<p>Probably I will write a new solid backend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thorGT</title>
		<link>http://blog.uninstall.it/2009/05/13/kformat-and-devicekit-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-4274</link>
		<dc:creator>thorGT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 12:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uninstall.it/?p=220#comment-4274</guid>
		<description>Great work!
As all this is about Device-Kit, are there any plans for a Device-Kit Solid backend? AFAIK Fedora is going to switch to it in near future, so a backend for solid is necessary (or are HAL and Dev-Kit compatible so that no changes are required?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work!<br />
As all this is about Device-Kit, are there any plans for a Device-Kit Solid backend? AFAIK Fedora is going to switch to it in near future, so a backend for solid is necessary (or are HAL and Dev-Kit compatible so that no changes are required?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foo</title>
		<link>http://blog.uninstall.it/2009/05/13/kformat-and-devicekit-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-4268</link>
		<dc:creator>foo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uninstall.it/?p=220#comment-4268</guid>
		<description>Great work, horrible user interface (sorry).

This is one very important piece that has been sorely missing so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work, horrible user interface (sorry).</p>
<p>This is one very important piece that has been sorely missing so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uninstall</title>
		<link>http://blog.uninstall.it/2009/05/13/kformat-and-devicekit-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-4267</link>
		<dc:creator>Uninstall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uninstall.it/?p=220#comment-4267</guid>
		<description>&gt; Will this be integrated in Solid? Or is it a different thing?
Probably we&#039;ll need a DeviceKit-disks solid backend soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> Will this be integrated in Solid? Or is it a different thing?<br />
Probably we&#8217;ll need a DeviceKit-disks solid backend soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ask21</title>
		<link>http://blog.uninstall.it/2009/05/13/kformat-and-devicekit-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-4266</link>
		<dc:creator>Ask21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uninstall.it/?p=220#comment-4266</guid>
		<description>Nice work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uninstall</title>
		<link>http://blog.uninstall.it/2009/05/13/kformat-and-devicekit-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-4265</link>
		<dc:creator>Uninstall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uninstall.it/?p=220#comment-4265</guid>
		<description>&gt;Looks quite nice. But the device dropdown menu is too close to the window controls
 &gt;on the title bar (both visually and from a usability standpoint: clicking just some
 &gt;pixels above will hide or close the window).
I will do an usability review when it will be ready.

&gt;Do you remember how we fantasized about the nice stuff we wanted to do with it a &gt;long long time ago - I can’t believe this is starting to become true.
Yes :)

&gt;i know that is only a first revision, but what about using the name of the divece like &gt;in widows instaed of /dev/sdxy ?
sure, I will use something better.

&gt;Will you be integrating some of QtParted later on when you do KDiskManager?
not really, I will use DeviceKit-disks partitioning support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>Looks quite nice. But the device dropdown menu is too close to the window controls<br />
 >on the title bar (both visually and from a usability standpoint: clicking just some<br />
 >pixels above will hide or close the window).<br />
I will do an usability review when it will be ready.</p>
<p>>Do you remember how we fantasized about the nice stuff we wanted to do with it a >long long time ago &#8211; I can’t believe this is starting to become true.<br />
Yes <img src='http://blog.uninstall.it/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>>i know that is only a first revision, but what about using the name of the divece like >in widows instaed of /dev/sdxy ?<br />
sure, I will use something better.</p>
<p>>Will you be integrating some of QtParted later on when you do KDiskManager?<br />
not really, I will use DeviceKit-disks partitioning support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ix</title>
		<link>http://blog.uninstall.it/2009/05/13/kformat-and-devicekit-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-4264</link>
		<dc:creator>ix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 19:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uninstall.it/?p=220#comment-4264</guid>
		<description>May I propose a new name? &quot;DiskKit&quot;. I thinkg this sounds better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I propose a new name? &#8220;DiskKit&#8221;. I thinkg this sounds better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.J. Capelis</title>
		<link>http://blog.uninstall.it/2009/05/13/kformat-and-devicekit-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-4263</link>
		<dc:creator>D.J. Capelis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uninstall.it/?p=220#comment-4263</guid>
		<description>Will you be integrating some of QtParted later on when you do KDiskManager?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will you be integrating some of QtParted later on when you do KDiskManager?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
